Friday, November 19, 2010

Last Blog: Dah Dah Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

By and large, I thought the topics discussed in class were quite interesting because most of the things presented were never visible to me beforehand. Out of all of the topics discussed throughout the semester, my favorite topic would have to be media influences and the copycat effect. One article during this topic that caught my attention and liking was ‘Media influence” by McLaren. In this article, it gave many examples of how people in our society have been victims of the copycat effect due to the media. Some people (not everyone) are interested in mimicking their celebrities or other things that interest them when watching television…etc. I also came to realize through class discussion and the 1998 film that people also copycat murders and other crimes from movies. I found this shocking but yet it was still interesting that people are actually dumb enough to copy such movies. One thing that had me “tripping” was the part of the film that talked about a woman who gathered others to rob a bank. This woman attempted to rob her designated bank by mimicking the robbery scene of “Set It Off” exactly. I also liked the blog along with this topic because we presented others with something we had mimicked from a media source. It was fascinating to see what my fellow classmates had mimicked from the media. I must also add that I liked the topic relating the bandwagon effect. If we see something in the media that displays majority of people doing, we would probably try to fit in and join that so called “wagon.”
The topics that I liked the least was about the marketing of diamonds and the Muraskin and Domash readings on cases such as Ramsey, Menendez and Peterson. I really didn’t like the marketing of diamonds topic because I didn’t feel like it was equivalent to any of the other material we learned in the class. The topic came out of nowhere and it seems like the only justice issue about it is that people are putting a high value on some that people are slaving over in Africa in hopes of making a dollar. Possibly, the fact that De Beers ads were not all factual was injustice, but people still live to those ads even though some may know that diamonds aren’t forever or that diamonds are a key to a women’s heart. I couldn’t really get into this topic because I feel like people put it on themselves. We, the people of the United States, are the ones that made diamonds what they are today. I believe this topic can have very conflicting sides.  In regards to the CJ policy and the cases such as Ramsey, I wasn’t that interested because I have heard about these cases in various other classes and heard about them also through the news. I had no will to think a lot about this topic because I knew most of the underlying detail.



The topics that I would like to see expanded would be the copycat effect because I find it interesting and I would like to know more about why people copycat stuff from the media and what they get from it. One thing that should have been limited was the presentation on suicide because all the things see talked about was redundant. I’m sure a lot of students in the class already knew some about suicide, but when the presentation went into depth, it may have caused some fear in us. Knowing the signs of suicide alone would cause fear because we may think suicide is possible if we have some of those signs (which is not so).
As I stated earlier, all the topics were interesting but some were more interesting than others. I felt like we spent as much time on each topic as needed to get the ideas across. So, if I were to teach a class on Media & Justice, I would probably make it more geared at the big picture of “Copycat Effect.”  There would be a lot of class discussion and I would probably ask the students to talk about their thoughts in class rather than on a blog. If possible, I would have all class members bring a laptop to class so the class as a whole could look at different medias and find justice issues. When looking at the copycat effect, I would use current day issues in the media that are relevant to justice issues such as a kid jumping of a bridge after seeing a celebrity doing so. I would also look at the media and see if the news media are telling different stories or not about the same issue. The class would also look at how the “copycat effect” affects the people in our society and decide if it could cause moral panics or other disturbances.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Explicit Material: 8 Mile


This movie is about a man named Jimmy Smith (Eminem) who is struggling with different aspects of his life. Jimmy is trying to start a career in rap music, but many conflicts come his way in the process. From the start, he has to deal with his mother that’s an alcoholic, and has to take care of his sister that he loves dearly.  Before the film, he had just broken up with his pregnant girlfriend and then started to mess around with another girl during the movie whom he met at his job. In the film, it shows a sex scene of him and this girl, having sex out in public for the most part. Also, the movie includes violence between his rivals “Leaders of the Free World.” Jimmy uses the rap battles to get revenge on those who victimized him. Overall the movie had a good plot, but it expressed a lot of strong language, sexuality, and some violence and drug. One thing that came to mind was that even though this movie is rated R, many children will be watching this movie because they see Eminem(Jimmy in the movie) as an idol. Even though they see him as an idol, it wouldn’t be beneficial to copy some of the acts that were shown in this movie. To excessively use strong language wouldn’t be good to use in today’s society if you want to get somewhere. The movie showed me that you have to deal with violence, bad mothers that do drugs, and have sex in public to become recognized and become a good rapper.

Monday, November 8, 2010

Explicit Lyrics: Eminem

Youtube video (audio video, not an actual music video)= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFIOwVWyC8M

"Kill You"

[Eminem]
When I was just a little baby boy,
my momma used to tell me these crazy things
She used to tell me my daddy was an evil man,
she used to tell me he hated me
But then I got a little bit older
and I realized, she was the crazy one
But there was nothing I could do or say to try to change it
cause that's just the way she was

They said I can't rap about being broke no more
They ain't say I can't rap about coke no more
(AH!) Slut, you think I won't choke no whore
'til the vocal cords don't work in her throat no more?!
(AH!) These motherfuckers are thinking I'm playing
Thinking I'm saying the shit cause I'm thinking it just to be saying it
(AH!) Put your hands down bitch, I ain't gonna shoot you
I'ma pull +YOU+ to this bullet, and put it through you
(AH!) Shut up slut, you're causing too much chaos
Just bend over and take it like a slut, OK Ma?
"Oh, now he's raping his own mother, abusing a whore,
snorting coke, and we gave him the Rolling Stone cover?"
You god damn right BITCH, and now it's too late
I'm triple platinum and tragedies happen in two states
I invented violence, you vile venomous volatile bitches
vain Vicadin, vrinnn Vrinnn, VRINNN! [*chainsaw revs up*]
Texas Chainsaw, left his brains all
dangling from his neck, while his head barely hangs on
Blood, guts, guns, cuts
Knives, lives, wives, nuns, sluts

[Chorus: Eminem]

Bitch I'ma kill you! You don't wanna fuck with me
Girls neither - you ain't nothing but a slut to me
Bitch I'ma kill you! You ain't got the balls to beef
We ain't gonna never stop beefing I don't squash the beef
You better kill me! I'ma be another rapper dead
for popping off at the mouth with shit I shouldn't said
But when they kill me - I'm bringing the world with me
Bitches too! You ain't nothing but a girl to me
.. I said you don't, wanna fuck with Shady (cause why?)
Cause Shady, will fucking kill you (ah-ha ha)
I said you don't, wanna fuck with Shady (why?)
Cause Shady, will fucking kill you..

[Eminem]
Bitch I'ma kill you! Like a murder weapon, I'ma conceal you
in a closet with mildew, sheets, pillows and film you
Buck with me, I been through hell, shut the hell up!
I'm trying to develop these pictures of the Devil to sell 'em
I ain't "acid rap," but I rap on acid
Got a new blow-up doll and just had a strap-on added
WHOOPS! Is that a subliminal hint? NO!
Just criminal intent to sodomize women again
Eminem offend? NO! Eminem insult
And if you ever give in to him, you give him an impulse
to do it again, THEN, if he does it again
you'll probably end up jumping out of something up on the 10th
(Ah!) Bitch I'ma kill you, I ain't done this ain't the chorus
I ain't even drug you in the woods yet to paint the forest
A bloodstain is orange after you wash it three or four times
in a tub but that's normal ain't it Norman?
Serial killer hiding murder material
in a cereal box on top of your stereo
Here we go again, we're out of our medicine
out of our minds, and we want in yours, let us in

[Chorus (first line starts "Or I'ma kill you!")]

[Eminem]
Eh-heh, know why I say these things?
Cause lady's screams keep creeping in Shady's dreams
And the way things seem, I shouldn't have to pay these shrinks
this eighty G's a week to say the same things TWEECE!
TWICE? Whatever, I hate these things
Fuck shots! I hope the weed'll outweigh these drinks
Motherfuckers want me to come on their radio shows
just to argue with 'em cause their ratings stink?
FUCK THAT! I'll choke radio announcer to bouncer
from fat bitch to off seventy-thousand pounds of her
from principal to the student body and counselor
from in-school to before school to out of school
I don't even believe in breathing I'm leaving air in your lungs
just to hear you keep screaming for me to seep it
OK, I'M READY TO GO PLAY
I GOT THE MACHETE FROM O.J.
I'M READY TO MAKE EVERYONE'S THROAT ACHE
You faggots keep egging me on
'til I have you at knifepoint, then you beg me to stop?
SHUT UP! Give me your hands and feet
I said SHUT UP when I'm talking to you
YOU HEAR ME? ANSWER ME!

[Chorus]
[first line starts "Or I'ma kill you!", ninth line starts "Bitch I'ma kill you!"]

[Eminem]
Ha ha, I'm just playing ladies
You know I love you

I choose the "Kill You" lyric because it displays male on female violence (family violence) and insult. This song went as far as talking about murder, rape, drugs, weapons, and referring to women as sluts and whores. The artist, Eminem, talked badly about his mother and you could clearly see that the problems with his mother really fueled this song. He is known for rapping about what he feels, but some of the things he talks about in songs is too much. He went from talking about his mother to saying he was going to kill her because she was nothing but a slut to him. His lyrics would relate to some people lives, but at the same time his songs are presented to all age groups, which is not a good thing. The language itself it back enough, but the scenarios that they paint are far worse. This song overall seems to glorifies violent crime/family violence and encourages its listeners to act in the same manner.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Suicide: WE, The Students, ARE VICTIMS!

In reflecting back on the presentation given by the Katie Baird, I learned some interesting and disturbing things about suicide. The one thing that hit me the hardiest during the presentation was the fact that someone commits suicide about every 2 hours. I consider this to be horrible because that would be 4380 deaths a year due to suicide alone (if I calculated correctly). Another disturbing thing that I didn’t know before the presentation was that 80% of people actually think about suicide at least once in their lives. I do believe that is true because people do go through hard times and they think what life would be like if they weren’t here on Earth anymore, or will they live pain free after death. Other statistics that bothered me was that 1,000 students take their own lives on college campuses, making suicide the second leading cause of death among college students. This made me think about myself and my friends and how prone we all are to become victims of suicide. Also, being that we are college students, we are more likely to die due to suicide than many others ways of death.
In addition to those statistics that hit me the hardiest, I was very informed and interested in the other material of the presentation on suicide. I was really interested in how she listed some warning of suicide such as irregular hygiene, change in sleeping patterns, drastic change in personality, change in academic performance, abuse of alcohol, changes in eating patterns, and talks about committing suicide. Because she informed the class about these warning signs, we are better able to notice if some of our friends are experiencing some signs of suicide, in order to get them proper help. In addition to the warning signs, Katie informed us on C.A.R.E. In relations to C.A.R.E, C stood for remaining calm and being a good listener, A stood for asking them about suicide, R stood for referring the person to get help (preferably CSDC/Varner House here on campus), and E stood for encouraging hope for the future, such as exploring and reinforcing the person’s reasons for living.  This information was very relevant in part because it will allow other like me to efficiently help someone without doing so the wrong way.
In conclusion, I really enjoyed the presentation even though it was a little long and disturbing. As a graduate student, aiming to be a middle school or high school counselor, she seemed very informed on suicide and you could tell that she had put some time in finding those statistics.  If it weren’t for Katie coming to our class this past Monday, I would have never known that suicide was the second leading death amongst college students. I would have never known all of the warning signs of suicide, and how to efficiently help those people who are showing warning signs. Something I didn’t mention earlier in this blog was that some of the myths of suicide I have taken in over past years are false. Before the presentation, I thought that all suicidal people want to die, but after the presentation, I found out that suicidal people are typically ambivalent about dying and will often seek help immediately. This really reversed my thought. All and all, the presentation was legit, informing and life changing.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Poisoning or Halloween: Trick or Myth

In relation to Halloween, I decided to do talk about an article titled “Poisoned Halloween Candy: Treat, Treat, or Myth” that I found on FoxNews.com. In the article, it spoke about how people have come to believe that some people in our society our trying to poison our children on Halloween.  It stated that despite what all the things that may gave lead parents to believe that, there has never been a documented case of a stranger poisoning kids’ Halloween candy. The article stated that every October since at least 60 years, phantom portraits of the evil Halloween humbug have been passed on by the media and word of mouth.  Even so, some parents still inspect the candy before they will allow their children to eat it. One researcher named Joel Best remarked that nearly 100 of the stories of contamination he came across were tall tales. A professor of pediatrics also mentioned that every October, there is a myth that strangers are getting ready to poison candy. The article then goes on to talk about one two cases that related to poison, both done within the family (no strangers). In the first case, a child was poisoned by Halloween candy. The 8-year old sucked on a Pixy Stix laced with cyanide and died in 1974. The killer was his own father. The other case dealt with a 5-year old who decided to try some of this uncle heroin. In attempts for the family to cover up their bad parenting, they sprinkled heroin on the child’s Halloween candy in hopes of using the candy myth to cover their negligence.  Lastly, the article stated that parents should worry about other things on Halloween, such as the high risk that a child can be killed by a car (4 times more likely).
From this article, I felt that people have come to believe that since Halloween is an “evil” holiday, weird strangers are out to kill their children with “POISON.” I have never believed in the myth because I have never seen any pure cases where they had found a perpetrator that was of no relatedness to the victim. The whole idea that a lot of people have beliefs that strangers poison candy can be seen as people being influenced by the bandwagon effect. If someone sees that the media has made a big deal out of poisoned candy, people in the communities are going to want to take measures to prevent these acts from being done on their children. I believe that this myth is going to be around for more years because it has marked itself in the holiday.
What’s your opinion on this?

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Free Blog: UFO

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local-beat/UFO-Sighting-in-Manhattan--104945964.html
I decided to do my blog on a video taken by CBS News of the weird objects that many people saw in the sky on October the 15th. The UFO, as they call it, was seen in New York, New York.  The city officials of seeing looking over the footage and they still haven’t provided any answers about what the object might have been. The article stated that some people thought it may be a balloon. The video above shows an oddly shaped object full of lights, flying slowly through the blue sky.  One witness called the spectacle “extraordinary.”
Based on seeing the video, I really don’t think it was a UFO. People in our society are just bizarre and crazy in the head. I don’t even believe in aliens. I will only believe in aliens if I were abducted by one or see one in a person. I so agree with the idea that the object was possibly three balloons floating in the air. The object didn’t even move much, and if it was a UFO, you would think they would be moving towards a destination in order to “learn” about us or something. I find this news story to be outrageously dumb.
What is your opinion?

Monday, October 25, 2010

1998 Film Response: Copycatting

After watching the video in class last Monday, I was shocked how many people mimicked stuff that they saw from movies or other media. It’s odd for me to see adults copying movies and trying to implement those crimes. I believe adults should know better to observe something that is not of norm in their society and try to imitate it. The only time I can understand one doing so is if they have some type of mental disorder. Two examples that stuck out to me the most were the two boys that tried to imitate the killing of “Scary Movie” and the one where the women gathered other women to imitate the robbery in the movie “Set It Off.” When the narrator was talking about the “Scary Movie” scenario, it was shocking to me how those young boys did such crimes on their friends and family. One killed stabbed their mother just to get money to buy the mask that the killer in the movie had (REALLY?). It’s really sad to see how these boys lives are revolving around a movie that’s suppose to be for entertainment, but it is used as a tool. In a sense, yeah they did imitate the movie, but they took it out of context (they weren’t acting, they were real). In the “Set It Off” scenario, it was bizarre to see how a one women was able to gather those women together to learn a robbery scene from a movie. They acted out the whole scene completely when they themselves robbed a bank. In this example, I’m not surprised that someone copied this because it worked for the characters in the movie. They tried to copycat it and they actually acted by what they saw. Even though I thought it was funny (ex. to be a banker and have heard the scene from somewhere), it’s still not right for someone to imitate someone to do commit a crime. Our society is more excepting of copycat acts that don’t deal with violence. Overall, the film was very informal about the acts of people that are influenced by movies. I believe that those things the people watched in the film have some impact on them, but I don’t believe the films are the overall cause of them going through with criminal acts. Like I said earlier, there has to be some possible underlying mental disorder. It’s okay to copycat something, but the acts shown in the film were way out of my norm.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

The Copycat Effect: "I Tell You Every'Tang"

When I think of copycatting the media, the first show that comes to mind is Mad TV. About three years ago, I was introduced to a character named Ms. Swan that I thought was hilarious. I loved how slow she acted in the skits, so I imitated some of them amongst friends and family. In the skits, she would always frustrate people because she would never answer a question. She would always reply “I will tell every’tang” and the question would never get answered. Being that I thought it was hilarious and cool, when my teachers or friends would ask me something, I would reply just as Ms.Swan. After I saw that they were getting frustrated, I stopped, but still thought it was hilarious afterwards. I while later, I decided to mock one of the skits where Ms.Swan went to the McRonalds drive thru and make it difficult for the drive thru worker. In attempt to imitate, I decided to go to a local McDonalds drive thru. I was having a blast until I found out that the person in the drive thru knew who I was. After that event, I kind of stopped copying Ms.Swan because it got old. I was also an independent experience for me because no one I knew was copying the skits, so I felt special for a period of time. I may just start copying some of the skits again by Ms.Swan. J

Monday, October 18, 2010

Imitation from Gaming Media: Jumpin' Off The Roof Like Jeff Hardy


http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/brooklyn/2009/04/15/2009-04-15_a_9yearold_wrestling_fan_jumped_off_his_brooklyn_apartment_roof_wearing_a_homema.html

I decided to do my blog on an article that I found online since I was unable to attend the homecoming game or parties. The article I found was about a 9 year-old boy named Damori Miles that died after an attempt to “possibly” imitate his favorite video game “PlayStation 2 WWE SmackDown vs. RAW.” Shakar, Damori's best friend, stated that his pal was imitating his favorite Playstation 2 game, which most likely led people to believe this was the boy’s motive. The reason why I choose this article was because it related to the reading “Media Influence,” where a 17 year old imitated a popular wrestling move on 3 year old. When it came to Damori Miles, he died when attempting to imitate Jeff Hardy’s swan dive from the top of his Brooklyn apartment. He attempted so by wrapping string around his body and using a plastic bag as a parachute. Epic fail! His broken body was found outside the apartment complex at 7pm and he died at the Interfaith Medical Center an hour later. One witness said they heard a thump and then happened to see a boy on the ground with his clothes ripped off. Oh yeah!..The article also mentioned that the Damori received special education instruction and the door to the roof where he jumped was unlocked (and the alarm didn’t sound).

Obviously his attempt was not well thought about beforehand, and he probably didn’t know better. Kids follow models in our society, and they should not be allowed to view anything of violent nature. Even though Damori was “possibly” imitating Jeff Hardy, the parents should have never allowed their son to even have the game.  The game is for those 13 years and up, and Damori was only 9. Also, why wasn’t he with his parents? They have to take some fault because they could have prevented the situation from happening if they had kept a close eye on him. Also, he was in a special education class, which kind of makes me believe that the boy’s mind was not in the right place during the time of the incident. He obviously thought the wrestler was awesome, and if the model could do it, so could he. He possibly could have missed the scene in the game where it states to not attempt anything seen at home. It didn't help that the roof door was unlock and the alarm didn't go off. The apartment complex should be at fault for that because it's a violation of safety. Hopefully people will realize that children are copycatting their models through observation. Only thing a child needs to commit a stupid act is: (1) the opportunity to observe an act a child shouldn’t see, (2) reinforcement from someone, and (3) the source from which the act would draw from. Parents can/should help prevent these things from happening, and maybe they won’t run the risk of losing a child due to the imitation of “bad” models in the media.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

(Mis)Information: Is My Life Full Of Mis(Truth)fulness?

I found the article of “(Mis)Information” to be very interesting because I feel the same about the various things the author stated. So much is the information that take in every day is not factual, but yet we still go along with it. Today’s society is greatly influenced by religion, politics, and economics, as the author stated in the article. I agree that the influences of this information are powerful and that people are supporting and believing policies that aren’t in their best interest. Because of the (mis)information of these influences, it causes people to carry on bias “facts” that aren’t in truthful. I also found the author’s causes of inaccurate information to also be interesting including: the bandwagon effect, confirmation bias, base fallacy, and cognitive dissonance. I really agree with the author along the lines of the Bandwagon effect because people have a habit of being copycats. Because of this, people do things because other people are doing it. This very obvious with Facebook but I’m not even going to go there. J
I can remember a time in my life when I believed something and it was not factual at all (and I know I’m not the only one). The belief was that on December 25th, Santa comes to your house, down your chimney, and delivers presents. Santa also was chubby, fat guys who came and ate your cookies and drink a glass of your milk (that has been sitting out…for him). Well, didn’t my parent tell me a lie? I found out that Santa was not real when I saw that my dad was the one eating the cookies, and my mom was the one putting the gifts underneath the tree. I was heartbroken when I found out that my parents were Mr & Miss Claus. But as I grew up, I started getting into church and actually found out the true meaning of Christmas. Christmas is a day to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. Also, I discovered that my parents had joined the “bandwagon” when I was younger. Lots of parents trick their kids into thinking that Christmas is all about Santa. Parents believe that if the other parents are doing it, they should do the same for their kids, which I kind of understand because it wouldn’t work well having some kids being in Santa and other kids knowing the actual meaning of Christmas. To avoid conflict, most children believed in Santa because of their parents. As I got older, I guess I jumped on another “bandwagon” because I followed my families/communities religion of Baptist (not like it was my choice to do otherwise).
I feel that the author’s proposal for the ‘Department of Information’ would be beneficial. I would be nice to have a department that would render what the real facts are. But at the same time, I don’t really see how this could happen efficiently. Even if we do have the ‘Department of Information,’ I still believe things will be bias because people have their First Amendment rights. I really don’t see society’s “bias facts” changing any time in the near future.  It would take a dyer miracle to get all information in our society to be of pure truth. As for now, I guess we have to deal with some more (Mis)Information.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Free Blog: Smoking Weed with Daddy

For my free blog, I wanted to find something disturbing dealing with children (and I did). In the article I found, it dealt with a father contributing marijuana to his daughters. The article didn’t give any names for the children, but father Jake Duke had 2 daughter (ages 6 and 7) and is being charged with marijuana possession, distributing to a minor, and child abuse. The charges drew up from an event that took place when the 6-year old tried to start a fire in the bathroom of her elementary school. When she was confronted for her act, she spoke able how she and her father smoked marijuana. It was shocking to one officer because the young girl knew more about marijuana than some adult. The 6-year old daughter even remarked that she didn’t like to smoke the seeds. Obviously, this girl had learned this stuff from observation because as Mesa county sheriff investigator stated “marijuana users commonly discard the seeds and stems from the marijuana plant.” Also, one of the daughters told authorities that her father would smoke weed and blow it in her face when she didn’t feel well. When the police searched the girl’s home, they found one small marijuana pipes, two large bongs, a digital scale, and a small bag of weed. The girls are currently staying with their grandparents after being taken away by child services.

This article was odd to me just because the child was so informal about marijuana. This is something that I would have never thought a child would learn in depth at such an early age. I suppose it’s understandable because kids are like sponges and they take in most of everything they observe. Even so, it’s still wrong for the father to use drugs around his children. He’s definitely not a good model for his children and not good father material. What father blows smoke in this child’s face? Because of his actions, he possibly could have scared the girls for life. Also, when I was reading the article, I wondered where the mother was. Was the mother also a “druggy” that didn’t care about smoking around the children, was the mother not in custody of the girls? If she was in the household and didn’t smoke weed, I don’t see how she could allow her children to live in those conditions.
In relation to the class reading and discussions, I don’t see this article as entertainment. I found this article to be more informing about something odd that is going on around us. I found it to be more of a warning to let people know that there are parents in our neighborhoods like do drugs around their children and the children are observing everything. Also, this article included victims that viewers would feel really sympathetic for. Children are the last thing people want to see getting victimized, in my opinion.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

"My Daddy Ate My Eyes...."


The article I found was quite disturbing. The story was about a man accused of biting out his 4-year old son’s eyes. Angelo Mendoza Sr., 34-years old at the time, for some reason decided to abuse his son Angelo Mendoza Jr. (4 years old). In late April, the child was discovered by a neighbor laying naked on the bloody floor of their Ohio Drive apartment located in Bakersfield, California. The Bakersfield police report quoted the son saying, “My daddy ate my eyes” and “Daddy bit my eyes and hands.” The police stated that Mendoza, the father, was in a wheelchair during the acts because of a spinal cord injury. After he brutalized his son, he rolled out of the apartment and started to hack away his leg with an ax. The police report that Mendoza was showing signs of being under the influence of PCP.
The Kern County Superior Court judge ruled that Angelo Mendoza was not mentally competent for trial. They recommended Mendoza be transferred to a county of state mental health facility. The first doctor to examine him believed that he would be able to stand trial if he stayed on the medication given. Even so, the criminal proceedings have been delayed multiple times because Mendoza Sr. was reportedly in poor medical condition and lacking communication. The charges of mayhem, torture, child cruelty, and inflicting injury on a child had put on hold due to his mental conditions.
The articles for this case were from 2009 (last court date mentioned was Sept. 22nd) and not a lot of information is spoken on the current processes of the trial.
This story is related to the class reading because it shows how the media shows disturbing and terrifying things that they know will draw the public’s attention. Also, this story happened to show how the media constructed CJ ecology is ideal offenders and ideal victims. The story made it seem like the ideal offender is some psycho path on PCP and a victim seem like an innocent child. As stated in the policy reading, Children are the archetypal innocent victims and key symbols in the media's social construction of crime (206).” Also from this story, I believe that people will see the need for more child protective services, in which the media would impact CJ policy.

I don’t believe that the media tried to make this case entertainment because there haven’t been any new stores about the case since late 2009. It seems as if the case has died. Yes, when the case first came out, it was eye opening to the viewers, but I don’t think that they tried to make it entertainment. If so, they would have tried to blow up the case much/ long as possible. I believe the simple fact that it involved a child and a mentally ill person drew in a lot of viewers. It does help that the crime was done between a father and son which would astonish a lot of people. The people were more worried about the littles boys safety and the mental capacity of the father.

For more information, watch this news video I found:

 

Monday, September 27, 2010

Murders In The Kandahar province of Afghanistan


I decided to use the news story about Jeremy Morlock’s hearing for killing Afghan citizens (and other charged) to compare the news sources: CNN FOX & MSNBC.
CNN- This news source stated that Jeremy Morlock was the first of five soldiers to be charged with premeditated murder of three Afghan civilians. He was from the 2nd infantry of Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington. His hearing will be held there for the murders of Mullah Adahdad, Marach Agha, and Gul Mudin. The news story then states that 12 other soldiers are charged with conspiracy to murder Afghan civilians and cover it up.  Five of them face murder charges, while the other seven just face charges with participating in covering up the murders.  The article also mentioned a man named Gibbs who kept body parts of the murder victims and kept photographs.
FOX- This news source stated that Jeremy Morlock, 22 years old, was charged with premeditated murder in the deaths of three Afghan civilians and could face the death penalty.  The murders took place in Kandahar province. This article also stated that he is also charged with assaulting a soldier in his unit. FOX then goes into his criminal history. It was stated that his wife sought a domestic violence protective order against him two years ago, and that he was also charged with assault and disorderly conduct where he was found guilty. The article then mentioned that even when he was 15 years old, he committed criminal acts. He was charged with leaving the scene of an accident involving an injury or death.
MSNBC- This news source stated that twelve soldiers have been charged with crimes. Jeremy Morlock has been charged with premeditated murdered of three Afghan civilians and the assault of a fellow soldier. Jeremy was also said to have a history of charges including domestic violence against his wife and leaving an accident scene involving a death or injury.  The article stated that this investigation is the grimmest of alleged atrocities by US military personnel during almost nine years of war in Afghanistan.  The news story then went into the information on the photos that were taken and how a soldier named Gibbs collected fingers and other body parts. Then article goes on to conclude with the thoughts of one of the murder’s families, the Winfield’s.
After reading the news stories from CNN, FOX, and MSNBC, I saw all the news stories were trying to inform the viewers that twelve of our U.S. soldiers are being charged for the murders of Afghan civilians. Even though they had the same story line with Jeremy Morlock as the highlight, they all included varying details. CNN went into detail with the names of the people that Jeremy murdered, whereas the other news sources didn’t give that information. FOX and MSNBC stated that Jeremy Morlock had a criminal history, whereas CNN didn’t inform about that. I also realized that FOX said Jeremy Morlock could be given the death penalty if found guilty. None of the other news sources brought up any information on possible convictions. There also another name mentioned in CNN and MSNBC that was not mentioned by FOX. CNN and MSNBC mentioned that a man named Gibbs is alleged to keeping body parts of the murder victims. The last different I came across after reading the story from all three new sources was that MSNBC was the only one to include a families thought about the issue. The Winfield Family was only mentioned in MSNBC, which have this news source more “juice”. I felt very informed by the MSNBC source story even though I can’t flat out tell which source is most factual.
Overall, I believe this story is one that we should know or be concerned about because it’s our nation’s soldiers that have committed these devastating acts. We should know about the people who took part in the murders and also about their criminal histories. We should be concerned about this because we see out nation as peaceful, trying to help other countries when he have our own soldiers killing innocent people in other countries. This leaves a bad image on the United States. As citizens, we have the right to be informed about these events. Also, we people are noisy, so we want to know about all that’s going on around us.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Marijuana Seizure In My Hometown


I decided to do my free blog on a marijuana seizure in my home town. The other reason I choose this issue was because the marijuana seizure was the largest in the entire state of Virginia for 2010. On August 11th, Richmond County Sheriff’s Office received a tip of a marijuana grow operation in the Newland area of Richmond County, VA.  On August 12th, investigators conducted surveillance around the subject area and claimed to have seen two men tending the plants. The suspects tried to flee when we law enforcement tried to confront, but only one got away. Jamie Ramirez-Duarte was captured and taken into custody.  The offender claimed t that he was being forced to take care of the plants by a Mexican drug cartel. He claimed that if he didn’t so as they wanted, the drug cartel would kill his family. The article stated that the police are investigation whether the operation is connected to gangs, but until then, Jamie Ramirez-Duarte is being held in jail without bond. They also believe he may be an immigrant that entered the US illegally. Police are still looking for the other suspect that got away.  DEA officials also showed up in Richmond County and found that the area looked like operations that have been done in California. The marijuana plots had lots of work done to them, including an irrigation system.
The investigators say that a total of 14,000 marijuana plants were seized. They claimed that the street value of the marijuana to be worth $45 million dollars. Before this event, the largest seizure of marijuana in Virginia was about 1,000 plants.
As bad as it sounds, at least my hometown has gotten noticed once again since the outcome of Chris Brown.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Lonnie Franklin : The Grim Sleeper (Finally Found?)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/10/grim-sleeper-suspect-had-4-decade-arrest-record/print/
In searching the web for articles relating to recent serial murders, I came across a man named Lonnie Franklin Jr. Franklin is a 57-year old man charged with 10 murders in the “Grime Sleeper” case and also a more current murder that took place in July of 2003. He is considered to be the Grime Sleeper who murdered several young women in South Los Angeles in the mid-1980s. The article states that the killings stopped for a while (due to Frankilin being spooked by the police in 1988), but resumed 14 years later.  Frankin is perceived to be the murderer of a victim in July 2003. At this time, he was suppose to be in county jail for stealing property, but was released from jail early because the jail was overcrowded.
 Before being arrested on Wednesday, July 7th, he had already been arrested at least 15 times over four decades. The article stated he had been charged previously with crimes such as burglary, car theft, and assault, but were never considered serious enough to send him to state prison or to warrant his entry in the state’s DNA database.
In the article, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck states that investigators are also trying to tie Franklin to 30 other murders that have went unsolved dating to 1984.  He also mentions that since they know who he is, where he lives, the cars he drove, and have people to interview, they’ll be going over all the old cases and look for connections.
The article also made a big point out DNA profiling. The law enforcement said despite more than two decades of old-fashioned police work, they were finally able to crack the case using a new and disputed technique of “familial DNA.” In June of 2010, Franklin’s DNA was sent through a database of 1.5 million samples. In doing so, they found no identical matches, but found a familial match to Franklin that had to be his brother or son. It was a coincidence that his son was added to the database in recent months due to a felony weapons conviction.  The investigators then alerted the LAPD of Franklin’s identity on June 30, which led to Lonnie Franklin being arrested. All they needed was a sample of Frankiln’s DNA to match those on the victims, so they got an undercover officer to pretend to be a waiter. The officer collected things like tableware, glasses and leftover pizza crust to obtain the need DNA from. With a match of DNA to that of the victims, they were able to arrest Franklin on several murder counts.
The article then goes on to say that he had his first court appearance on several crime that could lead to the death penalty or life in prison with possibility of parole.
In observing the article, I saw that it focused more on the serial killer. It gave background information about his past criminal history and also how he was sent to county jail but was then released because of overcrowding. I can’t say that the article focused a lot on the serial killer, but it definitely didn’t focus at all on the cases. The article reported that he is the perceived “Grim Sleeper” of whom they have been looking for since the 1980’s. The key thing of this article was “familial DNA” testing. One investigator made it clear to me that forensics in being more advanced than two decades ago. Now that that they had familial DNA testing, they were able to connect Franklin to victims, which led to his arrest. There were no nationwide statistics mentioned in the article. The article did mention that the LAPD was involved. The investigators alerted the LAPD of Franklin’s identity, in which they verifying it with birth certificated and other documentation. Unforunately, this article doesn’t state it the FBI was involved or not (even though I suppose the investigators mentioned in this article were from the FBI). There were no information given about the victims if Franklin. The article also didn’t mention much about the community besides given a description of Lonnie Franklin’s house and how he was three doors down from a house that had been searched extensively by police 22 years ago.
The most interesting thing about this article is that I learned about a serial killer that is also known as “Grim Sleeper” and that this person has killed 10 people and has been on the loose since the 1980’s. Being that I was very interested in the case, I decided to do more research and found other sites that give more information on the “Grime Sleeper” cases and more details about the people he victimized (of which the first victim was a female named Deborah Jackson that was murdered in August 10, 1985 and police say she was killed by a small caliber pistol).The sites are as follow:
http://thegrimsleeper.com/                 


Thursday, September 16, 2010

Comparing 'SpringFest' In The Media

I decided to go back to the stories that were going around during this past spring. As you all know, our university featured a Springfest that ended up in a riot. I chose two university articles (JMU & UVA) and one random media article from NowPublic.com.
In the article by JMU’s The Breeze, it stated more than 30 arrests, a stabbing, extensive property damage, and injured police & partygoers were due to the riot. More than 8,000 people appeared at the event, compared the approximate 2,000 people that normally attend. The Breeze stated as officers approached the riot, they threw grenades of tear gas at the crowd of more than 1,000, focusing on those people who were still loitering at 6:45 p.m. It also stated that some partygoers were sprayed with pepper spray or hit with rubber bullets and beanbags. The article then goes on to express Lt. Boshart’s one sided opinion about the riot. Towards the end of the article, it includes a mixed responses section where people stated their experiences during the riot. One of the student’s named Laura claimed that the police presence is what stopped the bottle throwing, whereas others believed that the police presence worsened the situation.
In the article by NowPublic, it stated that a large crowd of approximately 8,000 people near JMU turned into a full-scale riot when normally the party draws about 4,000 party-goers. Local police reported rioters throwing bottles and rocks at police, so they were forced to use pepper spray and tear gas in attempt to bring the riot to a halt. The NowPublic articles brought up at 30 people were arrested and several were injured by broken glass. This article stated that the riot was most likely started by people from out of town and that Facebook may have led to the large crowd that attended.
In the article by UVA’s The Cavalier Daily, it states first off that 20 to 30 people were arrested. They mention that the party normally sees in-between 1,000 to 2,000 attendants. The article then goes on to say that people were throwing and and bottles at each other and then throwing bottles at houses. Due to the riot, dumpsters were set on fire, and car windows were shattered. The Cavalier Daily then went on to say that it was possible that the presence of the police officers who were fully dressed in riot gear could have provoked more violence. A couple people were mentioned in the article that mentioned their views of the riot and one person stated, “It’s sad that the actions of a few people can affect the image of the university.”
From reading all of these articles, they seemed to all have the same story line about the riot outbreak here at JMU and how people were throwing bottles, and damaging property. All three articles seemed to show no bias from the author, although some of the people interviewed did express their viewpoints.
Even though they all had the same story line, they all included different details and facts, which may have been due to the authors excluding or exaggerating the truth. One thing I noticed that was different about the articles was that they all didn’t have exact numbers for those people who got arrested. In the Cavalier Daily article, it stated that 20 to 30 people were arrested. This clearly shows to me that they probably heard a lot of their information by word of mouth that traveled to the University of Virginia.  The two other articles stated that up to 30+ people were arrested.  Also, they all stated that approximately 8,000 people attended Springfest, but the NowPublic mentioned that the normal attendance was about 4,000 while the other articles stated the approximate normal attendance was about 2,000 or lower.  Some else different was that the NowPublic article said the rioters threw rocks at the police officers. None of the other stories mentioned students throwing rocks, so it may be that the NowPublic article made up some of its information to make their story stick out. The two other articles only mentioned rioters throwing things like beer bottles.
I can conclude that the Breeze article is the most factual article because its news is from within the radius of JMU. None of the information had to travel far to be reported. Also, the Breeze included a lot of details and facts that I am familiar with because I myself was an attendant of the Springfest(but didn’t take part in the riot). If someone wanted a good factual story about the riot, they should read the Breeze.  The last articles I would turn to for information about Springfest would be NowPublic and the Cavalier Daily because their information seems to be thrown together. Information had to travel to these places, and when you think about it, the truth normally doesn’t get too far before it’s flip-flopped around. 
From doing 3 story comparison, I saw that even though the storylines are the same, but the details and facts within them tend to always be different.

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Deviant Behavior All Up in 'Limewire'

LimeWire!!! (http://www.limewire.com/)


Limewire includes lame, lame, and lame in shining green and yellow colors. :)
Ok, in all realness, it includes links including How it works, Product Features, and Customer Support. You can choice from a select variety of languages, such as english, french, and spanish, in which you can browse the site with (The customer support page should include information advice about getting caught in the deviant-ness of the product). The site has random tabs saying "Download Now" or "Download Pro For Free."
So...............some may think this site is all fine and dandy, but in all reality IT’S DEVIANT! Limewire is a site where you can download torrent software that’s connected to a Gnutella network. Yes, Limewire created this software (which is legal), but that doesn’t mean it’s legal to share/download documents where copyrights are attached. Limewire is a tool, but once it gets into the hands of the consumers is when it goes to work and becomes illegal. Lots of people use this software, but they are unaware of the consequences that come with it. What’s also weird about the website is that you can download the basic free version, or you can pay for the PRO version for 34.95, which has LAME additional features. That’s a scam because you are paying for something that is legal at the time, but in all reality you are still getting involved in illegal activity still (so you might as well get the free version).


Back to what I said above about Limewire being a tool, why would people think of such software where it could get people involved troublesome activity? Yes, I would love to get free music from somewhere, but I really do believe that Limewire gobbles you in a world of illegal sharing. It’s better to pay for something now than to possibly get caught breaking copyright laws later.

……..(and I add)…The creators of Limewire should be the one getting the blame for people getting caught by the law and not the people in all reality. What’s sad is that they are creating more deviant behavior than our society needs. Same goes to all other torrents or file sharing networks, correct?

 
HOW DO YOU GUYS FEEL ABOUT THIS? COMMENT. COMMENT…..COMMENT NOW!!!! :)

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Fake Reality TV?!?

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C1154194%2C00.html


Article Summary/ Criticism


In the article “How Reality TV Fakes It” by James Poniewozik, it criticizes how reality shows are manipulated. The articles gives several cases where the producers play around with the film to make things more entertaining to viewers, but not actually all truthful. The author brings up the idea of Frankenbiting in which producers use under pressure to deliver a tidy story that’s not exactly reality. The staff members who create story lines and cobble video together argue constantly that they deserve to be covered by the Writers Guild of America. They run films out of order, cherry-pick facts and quotes, and even withhold information to downplay a romance in order to create fake suspense. The author then states that the problem with reality tv is that they have gained the power to imply or outright fabricate things about real people who have to carry their fake reputation into their normal everyday lives.


The article hit on the fact that some viewers may know that their favorite reality television shows are cast, but may not know all the fudging that’s going on behind scenes. More than half said accuracy is not a factor in the enjoyment of reality tv. Even so, there are some 30% of people who believe reality tv is factual and another 25% know it’s fabricated. As for the people in reality shows, they have both negative and positive effects from fabricated storylines. In one case, a star feels like she gained tremendous power from being shown as a vilified person across the country.



My Thoughts


From reading this article about how fake reality tv is, it makes me think that most media is untruthful, being that most forms of media want to entertain in order to gain viewings and good ratings. In order to entertain, many forms of media feel like they have to fabricate things in order to make their material seem more presentable.


The critique was good because the author brought up the point that even though reality tv is fake, many people like it. The critique also legit because it covered several reality tv shows that fabricated their films. So, if I were to turn on the tv and get caught up into a good show, it’s probably all fake because what reality is there when there is always some kind of drama going on?


The author doesn’t really suggest improvements, but if I could speak for him, he would want reality tv to be more real and truthful. Even though the author would want reality tv to be more REAL, he sees that people like the fake stories, so there’s not much he can do to change that. Most people like reality entertainment and if they want lies, they will most likely get a whole thirty to sixty minutes worth.

…..So I must say I’m opposed to fabricated shows, but they are still entertaining and it’s a good way to waste down time. This article was about reality tv, but if it were any other source of media such as the news, would people be okay if the stories were fabricated? .....Probably not, but that’s for you to decide. :P

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Media Fast: Day of Misery

On Thursday, September 2nd, I started my media fast because I had classes that could take up my time and it made sense to be to do the fast before I went home for the weekend. I woke up at 6:35am to my alarm clock. I took a shower, brushed my teeth, and got dressed for my 8 am class at Memorial. I wanted to check my Facebook and do my morning texting, but I told myself I could go a day without them. Soon after, I headed to class and as I was driving to school, I decided to sing to myself rather than listen to the radio. I did myself a favor by leaving my cell phone and ipod at my apartment. After I got out of my 8 am class, I rushed to get to my 930am class at Miller. As I was on my way to Miller, I talked to one of my new friends that I had just met a couple days before. After I got out of class once again, I drove to my apartment, once again singing aloud to myself (but really wanting to listen to the radio). When I got back to my apartment, I was immediately bored because I couldn’t watch tv, text, or get on the internet like normal. Instead, I decided to go to the pool and I was there for about an hour. At about 1230pm, I came back to my apartment and decided to occupy myself by eating. After eating (munch’n down), I decided to take a nap since my 2pm class was cancelled. When I woke up at 2pm, I was really bored, so I decided to do some of my readings for various classes, and also get things packed for the weekend trip home. At 5pm, I took another nap because I didn’t know what to do with myself or the time I had. I woke up an hour later to my roommates watching tv in the living room. I wanted to glance at what they were watching but I headed straight for the kitchen to get myself a bottle of water. I then went back to my room where I started to read this novel sized book for my Abnormal Psychology class. After reading the first 15 pages, I got bored with it and decided to turn my cell on. At first, I didn’t turn my phone on to text or call anyone. I meant to check and make sure I had no job calls or important/urgent messages, but my hands took over and I started texting tons of people. After about texting for about 5 minutes, I turned my cell back off because I was breaking my fast. At 7pm, drove to the Walmart to get some lead pencils and notebooks. Both ways (from the store/back to my apartment), I drove in silence. When I returned back to the apartment, I decided to read more of that long book. At 817pm, I turned my cell back on again, this time because I had to let my mom know that I was coming home. Soon after that, I turned my phone back off and started reading more of the book. At 9pm, I started getting ready for bed. Soon after I took my shower, I got into bed and fell asleep anytime better 11pm. Slept in silence except for the noises coming from outside.


The media fast OVERALL made me feel miserable because my life is more influenced by the media then I expected. I was good with giving up all other media, but my cell phone was calling my name all day. All I wanted was the day to end. Even though I broke my fast, I still wanted to do more texting/talking on my cell than I did. Overall I think I did a good job (others may not think the same). Who can do without their cell phone for a day? Uh…..it’s 2010!